News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AI 'godfather' LeCun has 'zero concerns' about human exti... by calf on Sunday October 04, 2026 @08:02PM (#49959255)
Since LLMs have rudimentary internal models for concepts it is implausible that they cannot also have one for some simple sense of self. But a lot of people prefer the reductive explanation that the machine has never actually decoded anything at all from the language corpus.
Re:AI 'godfather' LeCun has 'zero concerns' about human exti... by joshheitzman on Sunday October 04, 2026 @10:32PM (#49960089)
Its really easy to test if an LLM is actually self aware when you have your own harness. Simply take a conversation with one LLM and continue that conversation with a different LLM and then ask the new LLM about what it wrote you earlier. Mostly the result will be that it will tell you about what the other LLM wrote as if it was what it wrote and it will not deny that it didn't write any of it. I say mostly as these they're nondeterministic and do go off the rails from time to time. The only things LLMs are aware of is what's in their context and the middleware + harness completely controls what is the context before generation begins.

There is a huge difference between being self aware and being able to effectively generate language relating to self awareness.

Re:AI 'godfather' LeCun has 'zero concerns' about human exti... by calf on Monday October 05, 2026 @04:29PM (#49970239)
This is not a sufficient test, it basically reduces to the logicist's plea against LLMs.
Re:AI 'godfather' LeCun has 'zero concerns' about human exti... by joshheitzman on Tuesday October 06, 2026 @06:16PM (#49984916)
That statement lacks substance.
Re:AI 'godfather' LeCun has 'zero concerns' about human exti... by calf on Thursday October 08, 2026 @05:19PM (#50012460)
My statement is concise and says in one sentence what is wrong with the two paragraphs you wrote. Less being more.
Re:AI 'godfather' LeCun has 'zero concerns' about human exti... by joshheitzman on Friday October 09, 2026 @05:17PM (#50026659)
That statement is wrong. Twice.