Re:Federal judge calls Flock 'indiscriminate mass surveillance'
by qmr on Saturday October 03, 2026 @08:25PM
(#49949269)
There's no difference between a BOLO and a panopticon dragnet of always on AI powered cameras?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Federal judge calls Flock 'indiscriminate mass surveillance'
by ocdtrekkie on Saturday October 03, 2026 @10:16PM
(#49949965)
If they solely look for and record sightings of specific plates associated with active investigations? Not a lot, no.
The core problem with Flock is that it tracks innocent citizens on the off chance it helps catch a criminal, when it could be designed to only track already known wanted vehicles.
Re:Federal judge calls Flock 'indiscriminate mass surveillance'
by Spivak on Sunday October 04, 2026 @06:06AM
(#49952400)
You are committing the scale invariant fallacy where two things are the same if they only differ by scale. A chance encounter with a human who reports the sighting to be investigated isn't even surveillance, your massively watered down flock still turns a bolo into 24/7 surveillance of the vehicle going forward. Which if we use the test of could humans do this it would at minimum require a warrant.