News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Allow Carriers on Planes by kortilla on Friday September 25, 2026 @11:16AM (#49845812)
> No one travels with babies for fun

I have encountered this many times flying so it’s not “no one”. It’s usually younger couples who either don’t know what they are getting into or just have the energy to deal with it.

On international flights from the US it’s common to hear the reason is to bring the baby to see extended family.

Re:Allow Carriers on Planes by sanderjd on Friday September 25, 2026 @11:35AM (#49846057)
Yes but seeing extended family is not "for fun". Family is important.
Re:Allow Carriers on Planes by dgently7 on Friday September 25, 2026 @11:54AM (#49846269)
agree, and extend... ask any parent if taking small kids anywhere is a "vacation"

there is literally no such thing.

its like people who say that parental leave is a vacation. wildly miss informed and completely tone def.

Re:Allow Carriers on Planes by kortilla on Friday September 25, 2026 @01:02PM (#49847119)
That’s not correct. I took my small children on vacations to grandparents all the time. Taking the kids to any extended family that can help watch them is a vacation. The best vacations you can have involve just taking kids to see family.
Re:Allow Carriers on Planes by dgently7 on Friday September 25, 2026 @03:16PM (#49848711)
i mean "vacation" in the sense that people use the term to mean "a break from work"

small kids are always lots of work and this its pretty hard to have a vacation.

i agree that visiting fam is the best, partly bc they will help with the kids :)

Re:Allow Carriers on Planes by compiler-guy on Friday September 25, 2026 @12:19PM (#49846578)
That’s not what the idiom “don’t do x for fun” is about.

The expression means that X is the best of unpalatable options to accomplish something else, where X is taken in a literal and narrow sense.

People don’t fly with babies for fun. They do it because visiting grandparents is fun, and driving isn’t a good option. Or, if it involves a trip across the ocean, the alternative would be sailing.

Re:Allow Carriers on Planes by kortilla on Friday September 25, 2026 @12:59PM (#49847073)
Well that’s idiotic. Approximately nobody “flies for fun” under that tortured definition.
Re:Allow Carriers on Planes by Forgeties79 on Friday September 25, 2026 @03:05PM (#49848602)
> Approximately nobody “flies for fun” under that tortured definition.

Yes. That is exactly how it’s supposed to be used. The vast majority of people do not enjoy the airport/airline experience and were there any other reasonable way to get where they are going they would probably take it. They are not doing it because it is fun, they are doing it because they have to.

Re:Allow Carriers on Planes by compiler-guy on Friday September 25, 2026 @07:41PM (#49851563)
It’s a common idiom. And idioms are often weird. But that is exactly the point.