Re:Progressive JPEGs: a new best practice
by peterjmag on Saturday December 29, 2012 @04:05PM
(#4983463)
This is sort of tangential, but that browser chart reminded me of something I've been curious about for a while: Why do certain browsers only render foreground JPGs progressively? Is it a rendering engine limitation or an intentional one (perhaps for usability during page load)?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Progressive JPEGs: a new best practice
by Someone on Saturday December 29, 2012 @04:31PM
(#4983551)
Guessing: rendering anti-aliased text over an image background is expensive (you have to read the background image to blend colors). Re-rendering page text multiple times while an image is loading may not be a good idea.
Re:Progressive JPEGs: a new best practice
by TazeTSchnitzel on Saturday December 29, 2012 @08:02PM
(#4984078)
Browsers seem to be very lazy about this kind of thing, perhaps for that reason. Chrome dealt very weirdly with one of my sites, where I had an image, with a transparent-background iframe containing a semi-transparent-background div above it, and text above that iframe. The text's position was lagging relative to some images placed above it. I wonder if this is why.