News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Learn about Google's Project Suncatcher to put ML infrast... by tessierashpool on Thursday September 24, 2026 @02:03PM (#49834530)
there are two arguments for it.

one is marketing.

the other is that you could make tiny datacenters and flood the sky with them. in effect, not datacenters at all, but some kind of dataswarm coordinating at literal lightspeed via lasers.

they'd still be wildly expensive to deploy, and probably litter the orbit zone with fast-moving debris.

Re:Learn about Google's Project Suncatcher to put ML infrast... by nolok on Thursday September 24, 2026 @02:10PM (#49834613)
Your "other" makes no sense. It doesn't matter if you make a few big or a lot smaller, in space you will still need the same space for the same amount of megawatt. Or did you miss the scale of parent's post ? Because in that dream scenario of "let's ignore all the issues except that" and "the earth and the sun don't have any impact", it's still 3 THOUSANDS square meters for a MW of 8 racks.

You want to go smaller and go one rack only sure, it's still hundreds of square meters. Check the size of current orbital structure for a point of reference, you can't dwarf those and call it a "dataswarm of tiny datacenters flooding the sky".

Re:Learn about Google's Project Suncatcher to put ML infrast... by tessierashpool on Tuesday September 29, 2026 @05:47PM (#49901127)
don't shoot the messenger, dude. I didn't say there were any good arguments.