News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Starlink ground station in Poland hit by fire in suspected arson attack. Parent comment

Re:Starlink ground station in Poland hit by fire in suspecte... by vegardx on Thursday September 24, 2026 @11:24AM (#49831925)
The whole doctrine itself is built on the idea that you as an attacker don’t get to decide where the line is. The principle of ambiguity. Russia desperate wants to know where the line is, because they know very well that when they cross it it won’t end.

This is a fundamental principle of NATO as a defensive alliance, have always been and will continue to be.

Now you have voices, coming mostly from outside, that are trying to make this out to be a bad thing and to show some kind og weakness in the alliance, when it is one of the core tenants of the alliance itself.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Starlink ground station in Poland hit by fire in suspecte... by Havoc on Thursday September 24, 2026 @12:53PM (#49833454)
None of that answers the question. What does NATO practically do as response?

Principles, doctrines, ideas aren’t a response (or even an active decision to not respond)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Starlink ground station in Poland hit by fire in suspecte... by vegardx on Thursday September 24, 2026 @01:12PM (#49833723)
If Article 5 is invoked NATO responds, and if not, the countries supporting Ukraine already are, with sanctions and military aid that keep increasing over time. Russia wants to know our limits so they can push right up to them, and we shouldn't give them that.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Starlink ground station in Poland hit by fire in suspecte... by Havoc on Thursday September 24, 2026 @08:39PM (#49838761)
> If Article 5 is invoked NATO responds

Yes im asking what that response would be.

Say Russia lobs some ordnance at Poland. Kills a kid. Claims it was an accident and definitely totally won’t happen again.

What in your mind does a response look like? Find a Russian kid? March on Moscow? Nukes? Air strike? Angry letter?

Obviously it’s a test and there is a need to push back but how is the tricky bit. Anything you do would be an overtly action against grey zone deniable action.

[ Parent | on HN ]