News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Spymarks, Not Watermarks by BlaDeKke on Tuesday September 22, 2026 @01:06AM (#49796995)
They lacking in the AI race is an indicator that they value privacy more then competitors.
Re:Spymarks, Not Watermarks by bigyabai on Tuesday September 22, 2026 @01:20AM (#49797065)
No, it's just a sign of Apple holding a decades-long grudge against Nvidia to their own detriment.
Re:Spymarks, Not Watermarks by BlaDeKke on Tuesday September 22, 2026 @01:36AM (#49797164)
And there are no alternatives to Nvidia?
Re:Spymarks, Not Watermarks by stymaar on Tuesday September 22, 2026 @02:28AM (#49797418)
Why do you think NVDA is the most valuable company on planet Earth?
Re:Spymarks, Not Watermarks by bigbuppo on Tuesday September 22, 2026 @03:44AM (#49797858)
Because they're engaging in Enron-esque accounting tricks but because they admit what they're doing it's not illegal?
Re:Spymarks, Not Watermarks by bigyabai on Tuesday September 22, 2026 @12:19PM (#49803749)
Nvidia's a monopoly. It's not inherently illegal to be one, but they're going to control the market until someone comes along to compete.
Re:Spymarks, Not Watermarks by zdw on Tuesday September 22, 2026 @10:40AM (#49802104)
TBH, Nvidia kinda deserves this. Between the incredibly buggy forcedeth ethernet chipset, the 2010 era laptop GPUs with insane failure rates that caused a recall across the entire industry, and various other issues, Apple (and others) have legitimate reasons to avoid working with them.
Re:Spymarks, Not Watermarks by bigyabai on Tuesday September 22, 2026 @12:16PM (#49803709)
Both of those issues are over 2 decades old. It's the equivalent of boycotting Apple for supporting IBM, you will not achieve anything since the "problem" is already fixed. I don't know how you can call that legitimate in good faith.

Apple had the opportunity to take Apple Silicon to the datacenter and become the #1 professional ARM microarchitecture in the world. It was Apple's stupid grudge that gave Nvidia everything they needed to sell thousands of their lazily-made Grace CPU.

Re:Spymarks, Not Watermarks by xp84 on Thursday September 24, 2026 @08:42PM (#49838790)
Literally nothing that happened 15 years ago could possibly be cited as a good reason for a business to make a decision today.

Like, a significant portion of the people who were involved in any screwups made in the 2000s -- especially the more senior people who should get most of the blame -- are now retired.

Make decisions based on today and on reality. Apple holding a grudge against Nvidia today, if true (as we have no proof that it factors in, of course), is downright childish.

Re:Spymarks, Not Watermarks by embedding-shape on Tuesday September 22, 2026 @04:32AM (#49798159)
So they're lacking in the FOSS department because they value privacy? They lack in the human rights department because they value... What?
Re:Spymarks, Not Watermarks by someguynamedq on Tuesday September 22, 2026 @08:36AM (#49800238)
No, it's an indicator that reinventing every technology to work with your own private software/hardware stack has costs