News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:This Digital Radio Gets Messages to the World’s Remotest ... by _whiteCaps_ on Monday September 21, 2026 @03:04PM (#49791796)
Going to be super pedantic here - in ham radio you don't broadcast, you transmit.
Re:This Digital Radio Gets Messages to the World’s Remotest ... by mesh on Monday September 21, 2026 @04:35PM (#49793033)
Yes! Broadcasting is prohibited!

(and this all reminded I need to renew my license which I haven't used in about 8 years! Looks like I also need a refresher!)

Re:This Digital Radio Gets Messages to the World’s Remotest ... by kanbankaren on Monday September 21, 2026 @07:06PM (#49794647)
What is the difference between the two?

A ham operator might put out 20W of ERP while a radio station operates at 100W though international broadcasters use upto 500 kW.

Re:This Digital Radio Gets Messages to the World’s Remotest ... by drivers99 on Monday September 21, 2026 @08:10PM (#49795154)
Part 97 defines broadcasting as "Transmissions intended for reception by the general public, either direct or relayed."

Then there's a section that says:

> An amateur station shall not engage in any form of broadcasting, nor may an amateur station transmit one-way communications except as specifically provided in these rules

https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-47/part-97#p-97.113(b)

Since "broadcasting" is prohibited (except for the exceptions), there is a distinction. There actually are a lot of exceptions that allow different kinds of one-way transmissions though.

Re:This Digital Radio Gets Messages to the World’s Remotest ... by mesh on Monday September 21, 2026 @07:14PM (#49794721)
In the US with an amateur radio license you can have one to one communication (transmit) but not one to many (broadcast).
Re:This Digital Radio Gets Messages to the World’s Remotest ... by lacunary on Monday September 21, 2026 @10:05PM (#49795964)
hmm, been a minute since I got my ticket, but neither calling CQ nor working a net seem like one to one.
Re:This Digital Radio Gets Messages to the World’s Remotest ... by scarecrowbob on Monday September 21, 2026 @10:19PM (#49796062)
Isn't it the case that it's not a CQ unless someone responds?

Like, the response is kind of important for either a CQ or a net... whereas if I broadcast a pirate radio I am doing what I am trying to do just by sending.

Re:This Digital Radio Gets Messages to the World’s Remotest ... by lacunary on Monday September 21, 2026 @11:20PM (#49796453)
yes I think two-way vs one-way communication is a good characterization
Re:This Digital Radio Gets Messages to the World’s Remotest ... by sitzkrieg on Tuesday September 22, 2026 @12:31AM (#49796806)
the intention is to make a contact, not disseminate one way information. that is broadcasting
Re:This Digital Radio Gets Messages to the World’s Remotest ... by amatecha on Tuesday September 22, 2026 @01:40AM (#49797190)
The difference is the intent - calling CQ is the protocol for seeking a contact to communicate with. It's not broadcasting because you're trying to establish comms with someone, and not disseminating information "one-to-many". Running a net inherently intends to engage in contact with numerous stations - by definition not "broadcasting".
Re:This Digital Radio Gets Messages to the World’s Remotest ... by subscribed on Tuesday September 22, 2026 @04:05AM (#49797987)
> What is the difference

Except the CQ you only transmit for the specific recipient.

I believe broadcasting in one way only (there's no conversation part).