News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: How I turned an old book into a (barely) profita... by sixQuarks on Thursday December 27, 2012 @01:07PM (#4974309)
Is there any evidence that this actually affects SEO or rankings?
Re:Show HN: How I turned an old book into a (barely) profita... by JonnieCache on Thursday December 27, 2012 @01:32PM (#4974437)
Wikipedia is a perfect storm of pagerank so unless google have specifically made an exception for it, links from there must be pretty valuable. IANASEO.
Re:Show HN: How I turned an old book into a (barely) profita... by rmc on Thursday December 27, 2012 @01:42PM (#4974472)
For exactly this reason Wikipedia adds "nofollow" attributes to all external links on Wikipedia. You will get no SEO / page rank link juice from adding links to Wikipedia. You will probably get organic traffic though.
Re:Show HN: How I turned an old book into a (barely) profita... by JonnieCache on Thursday December 27, 2012 @02:36PM (#4974699)
Duh. Can't believe I forgot about that. Not really on the ball today. What am I even doing here? This is meant to be my holiday...
Re:Show HN: How I turned an old book into a (barely) profita... by matznerd on Thursday December 27, 2012 @03:12PM (#4974814)
Just because a link is "nofollow" does not mean you get no juice. Being linked to from wikipedia definitely helps a site's rankings...
Re:Show HN: How I turned an old book into a (barely) profita... by vicks711 on Friday December 28, 2012 @10:41AM (#4978056)
Argument that "nofollow" = "no seo juice" is debatable. Many SEO believe that lots of links from Wikipedia does help.

I have no data of my own to support the above. Theory says that "nofollow" will not help is SEO.

Re:Show HN: How I turned an old book into a (barely) profita... by Chico75 on Thursday December 27, 2012 @01:42PM (#4974477)
All externals links on wikipedia use the no-follow tag to prevent that type of spamming (http://www.searchenginejournal.com/all-wikipedia-links-are-n...)