Re:New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore
by throwawalien on Monday September 14, 2026 @11:06AM
(#49698189)
devil's advocate - if they are HQ'd in the US, is hiring US citizens that big of an ask? why do they need cheap overseas labor?
Re:New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore
by lokar on Monday September 14, 2026 @11:10AM
(#49698270)
IME it’s not cheaper, it’s the only way to find enough qualified people
Re:New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore
by throwawalien on Monday September 14, 2026 @11:15AM
(#49698356)
IME at my org we have 3 contractors out of SE Asia to every 1 US FT role. They make less than a third of a FT US employee.
Re:New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore
by lokar on Monday September 14, 2026 @12:44PM
(#49699868)
Yes, there is a ton of abuse that drives down pay for many people.
We should find way to improve the system.
Re:New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore
by alistairSH on Monday September 14, 2026 @01:27PM
(#49700651)
Meh, not sure I really buy that argument. I've never had a problem hiring in the US. And this is for a mid-tier, mid-size software company that most people have never heard of, not located in SV, and PE-owned (not much in the way of big bonuses and no stock options).
Re:New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore
by lokar on Monday September 14, 2026 @05:01PM
(#49703953)
I’ve interviewed hundreds of people over many years. Lucky to find one out of 10 that are good.
Re:New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore
by alistairSH on Monday September 14, 2026 @06:38PM
(#49705200)
1/10 sounds in the ballpark - I think my ratio is better, but not by much. About half my interviews have been with candidates in India, half US, all for software engineering roles, mostly early to mid-career. Success rates weren't significantly different between the countries. Haven't had the chance to interview in Mexico yet, but we have an office there, so that'll probably happen soon.
Re:New $100k H-1B visa fee pushes tech jobs offshore
by alistairSH on Monday September 14, 2026 @01:24PM
(#49700602)
For us, it's a mix of...
Local SMEs (regulatory requirements), sales, local implementation teams, HR / legal (to support the previous employees). And engineers.
Sales and implementation could maybe be US-based, but then we're flying them around the globe. Not sure that makes sense vs hiring locals.
SMEs, similar story - not always available in the US.
The engineers are the only ones that could realistically be co-located in the US. But, a good chunk of those were acqui-hired, so now you're asking them all to relocate to the US? Not sure that's viable in the best of times, and definitely not in today's ass-backwards political climate.
My employer sells software internationally - are you claiming any international job should be subject to some sort of fine simply because the company is HQed in the US?
I suppose we could try slicing revenue or profit by sales region and comparing against headcount expense per region? But with salaries abroad being a fraction of in the US, that math might still work out in favor of keeping international employees.
EDIT - I dislike the H1B system overall. Just not sure "fine companies that operate overseas" is something we should consider as a replacement.