If the government took one tenth of the money it spends on defense every year (which was $1.030–$1.415 trillion for 2012), or approximately $100 billion dollars, and invested it in driverless car research and the infrastructure changes necessary for it, a much bigger benefit could be wrought. But that won't happen, because it's the lobbying of the military-industrial complex that determines where money is spent.

Most of what you said is true enough, but this nonsense loses you credibility. It's like saying "it's the corporations, man."

The business of buying weapons that takes place in the Pentagon is a corrupt business - ethically and morally corrupt from top to bottom. The process is dominated by advocacy, with few, if any, checks and balances. Most people in power like this system of doing business and do not want it changed.

-- Colonel James G. Burton

A rose is a rose is a rose, and so is a turd; what labels you accept or don't is your personal thing, but otherwise irrelevant.

http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/10/09/army-to-congress-th...

  A call to the CDC press office revealed that the number of 
  deaths from food allergies, as collected from 2.5 million 
  death certificates across the country, is miniscule. Only 
  eleven people died from food allergies in 2005, the last year 
  for which we have data available. More people died from 
  lawnmower accidents.