News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon refused to give pregnant workers bathroom breaks by 00ze on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @05:47PM (#49634872)
No where is it written here they shouldn't

Not everything needs to be a panacea to cover all edge cases

Legally a specific situation is often required

Imo it is a phony obligation to fragment people via feigned ignorance and willful ignorance, create liquidity of a sort in the litigation market making everyone fight the same fires over and over but that is currently how it works

Re:Amazon refused to give pregnant workers bathroom breaks by ajuc on Wednesday September 09, 2026 @06:22PM (#49635371)
1. they shouldn't even have to work, they should be on a paid leave

2. if they want to work - they should have preferential treatment

3. even if they are not pregnant - their bathroom breaks or the ability to sit down shouldn't be limited by their employer

Reading about American work culture is uncanny. It's like people arguing about css-styling the NPE error stacktrace, and everybody just assumes the null dateOfBirth in the database and 5 levels of backend code without null checks is just how it has to be.

Re:Amazon refused to give pregnant workers bathroom breaks by ChoGGi on Thursday September 10, 2026 @09:27AM (#49643382)
> 3. even if they are not pregnant - their bathroom breaks or the ability to sit down shouldn't be limited by their employer

See most retail workers, and anyone behind a cash register.

Re:Amazon refused to give pregnant workers bathroom breaks by worik on Thursday September 10, 2026 @03:59PM (#49649425)
> See most retail workers, and anyone behind a cash register.

Yes, but only the people at the "coal face"

The managers in the background toilet at will.

Re:Amazon refused to give pregnant workers bathroom breaks by ajuc on Friday September 11, 2026 @03:32PM (#49664098)
> See most retail workers, and anyone behind a cash register.

Why would people behind cash register have to stand?