News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:'You Can See Everything' Review: Nathan Fielder's Doc Abo... by tzury on Monday September 07, 2026 @11:18AM (#49599396)
I am reading a comment (1) by a person (2) who read an article on a newspaper website (3) discussing a book (4) written by someone about the life (5) of Stephen Hawking.

What I read !== Stephen Hawking.

Re:'You Can See Everything' Review: Nathan Fielder's Doc Abo... by NDizzle on Monday September 07, 2026 @11:49AM (#49599703)
Words will never be a human, for what it's worth. May as well delete that code path, as it'll never be reached.
Re:'You Can See Everything' Review: Nathan Fielder's Doc Abo... by satvikpendem on Monday September 07, 2026 @02:22PM (#49601317)
By that logic don't read anything at all.
Re:'You Can See Everything' Review: Nathan Fielder's Doc Abo... by mmooss on Monday September 07, 2026 @10:54PM (#49605224)
? It's not hard to find material based on primary evidence and direct observations of it. That is fundamental to all scholarship and also, to a significant degree, journalism, law, etc.
Re:'You Can See Everything' Review: Nathan Fielder's Doc Abo... by satvikpendem on Tuesday September 08, 2026 @10:48PM (#49620222)
They specifically said

> What I read !== Stephen Hawking.

And by that logic one cannot know anything or anyone by merely reading about them, which I find to be absurd, hence my comment.