Re:Mozilla brings back 64-bit builds of Firefox for Windows
by sliverstorm on Friday December 21, 2012 @10:40PM
(#4955694)
I'm not advocating the "One Way". Rather, I gather the thousand-tabs users are fringe. They are welcome to use it that way if they like. But when it comes to development; is it better to spend developer time on making Firefox a lot better for 1% of users, or a little better for 95% of users?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mozilla brings back 64-bit builds of Firefox for Windows
by eitland on Saturday December 22, 2012 @04:29AM
(#4956220)
Because we are the ones that use FF? ;-)
Halfway joking here but I think perfectly ordinary people who just use a few tabs at a time tends to just use whatever thay get their hands on, -IE on Windows or Safari on Mac.
This means there is already a bias here: Those who use FF use it anyway because there is no alternative that has Scrapbook extension (offline browsing w/searchability), tree tabs (for automatic mind mapping) that also handles 100-200 tabs in a good way. (Read up on David Allen on using your memory for real work not to remember addresses and tasks for why some people find this useful.)
Re:Mozilla brings back 64-bit builds of Firefox for Windows
by asadotzler on Sunday December 23, 2012 @02:01PM
(#4960257)
We have data on Firefox tab usage. It's not at all what you have suggested. Most Firefox users never have more than 5 or 6 tabs open at a time. The median is about 3 tabs. See http://66.43.220.232/james/mozilla-challenge.html for some slightly out of date but not too far off data. (Note, these are the "geeks" that opted in to our study so it's likely skewed a bit to the heavier tab users.)