News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on How accurate have Ed Zitron's AI skeptic predictions been?. Parent comment

Re:How accurate have Ed Zitron's AI skeptic predictions been? by comfysocks on Tuesday September 01, 2026 @06:46PM (#49529307)
To be fair to Ed, I’d describe his usual argument (at least currently) as saying that Meta, MS, google are “mature” companies trying to be maintain the high valuations and growth of a young company, which they no longer are.

If you take this to be his argument, then dan’s numbers are more consistent ed’s claim.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:How accurate have Ed Zitron's AI skeptic predictions been? by ngcazz on Tuesday September 01, 2026 @08:20PM (#49530173)
more consistent with? more consistent than?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:How accurate have Ed Zitron's AI skeptic predictions been? by comfysocks on Tuesday September 01, 2026 @09:27PM (#49530633)
Yes, “consistent with”. Thanks.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:How accurate have Ed Zitron's AI skeptic predictions been? by Danox on Wednesday September 02, 2026 @12:01AM (#49531572)
Of the three Google is in the best position. Meta and MS are in trouble. Zuckerberg will survive because he has control of his company, but Nadella is not going to survive Copilot if it don’t work.
[ Parent | on HN ]