Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1

Re:Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 by api on Tuesday September 01, 2026 @04:04PM (#49527353)

It's more likely that this is from the training data if they're being trained on reams of Internet stuff.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 by jurgenburgen on Tuesday September 01, 2026 @04:24PM (#49527633)

Isn’t most of the internet slop by now? Self-reinforcing feedback loop.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 by camoby on Tuesday September 01, 2026 @07:57PM (#49529979)

See: upvotes here

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 by kristianc on Tuesday September 01, 2026 @05:17PM (#49528337)

To me it has a writerly New Yorker vibe to it, as in the magazine which reads as “polished” and probably performs well in RL but is totally exhausting to read in long sessions and completely inappropriate for coding where precision is paramount above all. In writing terms its called purple prose.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purple_prose

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 by senderista on Wednesday September 02, 2026 @12:45AM (#49531826)

The New Yorker may be pretentious but it's generally not unreadable like Opus.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Mythos 5.1 by Bluestein on Wednesday September 02, 2026 @02:38AM (#49532540)

Claude is unreadable and sometimes pretentious.-

[ Parent | on HN ]