Re:Evidence of Fraud in an Influential Study About Procrasti...
by rightnutwingjob on Tuesday September 01, 2026 @02:02PM
(#49525513)
Shoosh. And if you won’t shoosh yourself, a handful of The True Adherents Of The Science will down vote you.
Because Down Votes Are Truth.
And that, ladies n gennelman, is How Science Works.
That’s how we end up with Jason Arday: Up Votes.
https://www.theweek.in/news/world/2026/08/28/new-satellite-i...
The two links I give show the problem in action. In 2013 the IPCC was concerned because temperatures had gone sideways for a decade. Der Spiegel's first sentence is "Data shows global temperatures aren't rising the way climate scientists have predicted" and the next says they were trying to "hush it up". In 2015 climatologists announced a new temperature record that replaced the entire 21st century with different data, as reported by Nature.
That's an unambiguous sequence of events. You can't make statements about replicability in an environment where they routinely decide their already published data is wrong post-hoc, without retracting the papers built on that data.