Re:Nate Silver confuses cause and effect, ends up defending ...
by drcode on Thursday December 20, 2012 @11:04PM
(#4951434)
I agree that Nate Silver's book is short on many subjects (such as politics) but the goal of his book is not to explain "Why did X happen" but simply to discuss the challenges of prediction within different domains. It's a book that helps people learn the art/science/challenges of prediction.
Saying that his book lacks detailed discussions of incentives (while true) misses the point of his book.
Saying that his book lacks detailed discussions of incentives (while true) misses the point of his book.