News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nate Silver confuses cause and effect, ends up defending ... by drcode on Thursday December 20, 2012 @11:04PM (#4951434)
I agree that Nate Silver's book is short on many subjects (such as politics) but the goal of his book is not to explain "Why did X happen" but simply to discuss the challenges of prediction within different domains. It's a book that helps people learn the art/science/challenges of prediction.

Saying that his book lacks detailed discussions of incentives (while true) misses the point of his book.

There are no comments on this comment yet.