News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Brits would quite like their private messages to stay pri... by warrantisall on Monday August 31, 2026 @12:39AM (#49505652)
The person was not charged with destruction of evidence, rather destruction of property to prevent a seizure.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.gand.35...

To be charged with destruction of evidence, the data contained in the device has to be justified as such. It appears this was not the case, note this person was not indicted or accused of anything else too.

There are no comments on this comment yet.