> And he's holding MTW's Gravitation tome in the photo!

I think it's because it's book with very large title font, which shows the mirror isn't reversing the text. It just also happens to be a favorite book of his (much better than if you saw "$AUTHOR_NAME" which is what you'd see for popular fiction, wouldn't you say?)

Because it's not quite the same holding a Kindle displaying cover art up to your face.

Because most people don't read at all, or read BS (self-help books, how to succeed, cheap thrillers, 50 shades of gray...)

Have you read fifty shades? I find that people like to bag on stuff they've never actually experienced first hand.

Embarrassingly, I listened to a youtube video where a woman read the book aloud (I listened for about 30 pages). She ended up hitting herself in the head about a dozen times because the writing is that awful.

Fifty Shades is pornography for women. IMHO that's the only reason everyone is clutching their pearls about the bad writing. Your typical male pornography storylines/cinematography are much, much worse - and yet they are typically spared the high-brow literary scrutiny.

In line with woah (minus the snark), male-focused porn is generally spared the scrutiny because it does not seek it. You won't read a review of Modern Whorefare (sadly a real thing) in the New York Times and you won't be able to pick it up at the grocery store. A difference in marketing and distribution amply explains the greater scrutiny, without resorting to implications of sexism.

Yep, must be the patriarchy oppressin' again.

The reason that 50 Shades of Grey is subjected to highbrow literary scrutiny, is that it pretends to be highbrow literature. Male pornography usually makes no pretense, being more along the lines of logjammin' "ich bin here to fix your kable"

Not really. The reason 50 Shades gets its scrutiny is because it has enough exposure. There's some damn good male pornography (yes, it's literary; yes, I read it) out there, but it's not for sale at Barnes & Noble.

That's the patriarchy angle, if you actually want it.

Maybe because your "typical male pornography storyline/cinematography" is considered neither a "cultural phenomenon" nor "literature", and does not feature in newspapers and magazine reviews...

Male porn is just porn, but "50 shades of gray" is presented as it is a regular book...

Fifty Shades of Grey is just Jane Eyre rehashed - young virgin falls in love with rich powerful man. Same story, just a little bit more descriptive when it comes to the sex scenes.

The similarity ends on the plot summary level -- which is the most superficial part in literature.

It's also 20 levels below in writing quality, like a messed up straight 20,000 lines amateur PHP monstrosity compared to something written by Rich Hickey.

Yes. Still crap.