Re:Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
by bentt on Friday August 28, 2026 @11:22PM
(#49486604)
I'd need to have a problem I couldn't solve with current models for my eyes to wander.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
by znnajdla on Friday August 28, 2026 @11:51PM
(#49486721)
Yeah I haven’t had a problem yet which was too difficult for Fable to solve. I do have problems which Sol does not do well on. But if I could get Fable-level intelligence faster/cheaper and less restricted, that’s all I need.
Re:Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
by cheeze on Saturday August 29, 2026 @01:04AM
(#49487020)
Fable is great minus it's annoying writing style. It's nowhere near as bad as Opus 5 but it's very "AI trope-y" even with heavy steering. I can spot the writing immediately.
Re:Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
by muddi900 on Sunday August 30, 2026 @07:53AM
(#49497887)
Asking your models to follow the google developer guidelines is angood way to get good responses from them.
Re:Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
by akmarinov on Saturday August 29, 2026 @12:46AM
(#49486957)
What if it’s cheaper too?
Re:Our decision on Cursor following its acquisition by SpaceX
by dakolli on Saturday August 29, 2026 @12:59AM
(#49487004)
Yeah not sure why everyone thinks they need a PhD lvl assitant to build their slop SaaS when an open source model that is 100x cheaper, and 3x faster and arguably still "PhD" level assitant could also build their slop SaaS.