News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:MIT's Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, a... by phasefactor on Thursday August 27, 2026 @11:18AM (#49466266)
I guess prolific em-dashes is not considered a sign of LLM writing anymore.
Re:MIT's Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, a... by tyrabound on Thursday August 27, 2026 @11:34AM (#49466539)
It's actually not em-dashes, they are en-dashes, which is either intentionally to deceive (e.g., swapped) or used incorrectly. Both of which are bad, it's up to everyone to decide on which is worse coming from MITality.
Re:MIT's Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, a... by jacobolus on Thursday August 27, 2026 @12:04PM (#49467052)
Spaced en dashes – like this – are a correct and accepted typographical choice. Whether to use spaced en dashes or (spaced or unspaced) em dashes is a matter of taste or local convention, and varies from one publication to another. Other than a typo or two where the space was left out on one side of a dash, the dashes in this linked document are just fine. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dash#En_dash_versus_em_dash
Re:MIT's Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, a... by phasefactor on Thursday August 27, 2026 @03:46PM (#49470214)
I was not claiming they are not correct punctuation/syntax. My claim is just no one uses them that frequently... When you see dozens of them in the first few pages of a document it raises suspicion.
Re:MIT's Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, a... by jacobolus on Thursday August 27, 2026 @06:22PM (#49472067)
Some authors use a ton of dashes, while others never use dashes.
Re:MIT's Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, a... by jaggederest on Thursday August 27, 2026 @09:20PM (#49473287)
This is likely an artifact of writing standards - not especially suspicious, it's like MIT Tech Review or the New Yorker using diaresis when they need to say reëducate.
Re:MIT's Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, a... by FabHK on Saturday August 29, 2026 @12:12AM (#49486808)
Sad that people now consider basic knowledge of typography, punctuation, and orthography a sign of AI.
Re:MIT's Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, a... by ghaff on Thursday August 27, 2026 @01:57PM (#49468718)
I am not an LLM and use em-dashes and they were house style in my last 20+ years of employment. The whole em dashes == AI thing needs to just stop.
Re:MIT's Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, a... by phasefactor on Thursday August 27, 2026 @03:43PM (#49470182)
It is more about the document containing more than sixty of them. They are a completely legitimate piece of punctuation, but even prolific pre-LLM users did not tend to go that wild with them.
Re:MIT's Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, a... by ghaff on Thursday August 27, 2026 @04:26PM (#49470727)
I did not notice anything about the document in that regard that was worthy of note.
Re:MIT's Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, a... by peri-cl on Friday August 28, 2026 @02:31AM (#49475066)
Speaking about style choices, I was curious why you sometimes use the 'f' from the Latin Extended-B block, U+0192, in your comments. I've never seen that before! (I'd meant to ignore it but you seem to be soliciting typography discussions...)
Re:MIT's Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, a... by ghaff on Friday August 28, 2026 @10:48AM (#49479354)
Probably a fat finger of some sort or it came through a copy and paste. Nothing I do deliberately.
Re:MIT's Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, a... by DonsDiscountGas on Friday August 28, 2026 @10:53AM (#49479452)
Do you think LLMs invented the em dash? Pre LLM, em dashes were a sign of pretentiousness. Which is why LLMs learned to use them, and why a document produced by a university has plenty of them.