News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:RAG Is Simpler Than You Think by dominotw on Wednesday August 26, 2026 @11:06AM (#49450486)
> particularly if your primary usecase is to search for technical keywords or codenames.

i dont believe ppl are building rag for this

Re:RAG Is Simpler Than You Think by locknitpicker on Wednesday August 26, 2026 @03:42PM (#49454712)
> i dont believe ppl are building rag for this

What do you actually think people do when using LLMs to build AI coding agents?

Re:RAG Is Simpler Than You Think by eureka7 on Wednesday August 26, 2026 @03:46PM (#49454769)
They are, I have people at work building RAG search engines for stuff that works just fine using full text search, or if you really need it, using a cheap model in codex/opencode.

You underestimate the ability of people to overengineer things.

Re:RAG Is Simpler Than You Think by j0selit0 on Thursday August 27, 2026 @04:51AM (#49461765)
this is quite nuanced. in financial markets you have a combination of natural language questions that involve technical keywords / slang / acronym. and for these specific terms, an off-the-shelf embeddings model fails miserably.