Re:More than half of adults in U.S. say they lack basic stat...
by selcuka on Wednesday August 26, 2026 @03:07AM
(#49445084)
> When told to a statistically illiterate person?
Which is a rounding error from 100% according to the GP.
Re:More than half of adults in U.S. say they lack basic stat...
by red75prime on Wednesday August 26, 2026 @03:46AM
(#49445360)
That's obvious. I just hope the OP doesn't end up with the same expression as Anakin in the Anakin-and-Padme meme after this question.
Re:More than half of adults in U.S. say they lack basic stat...
by Tarq0n on Wednesday August 26, 2026 @04:53AM
(#49445830)
Being aware of Simpsons' paradox doesn't even help. There's no way of knowing what the right level of aggregation is without a theory.
Re:More than half of adults in U.S. say they lack basic stat...
by NooneAtAll3 on Wednesday August 26, 2026 @06:43AM
(#49446735)
speaking of theory, what exactly is the solution to this paradox?
what happens when data just russian-dolls in both directions the deeper you look?
Re:More than half of adults in U.S. say they lack basic stat...
by duskdozer on Wednesday August 26, 2026 @07:11AM
(#49446944)
When I have seen instances of this, it's usually because there is another variable. Example from wikipedia:
>A common example of Simpson's paradox involves the batting averages of players in professional baseball. It is possible for one player to have a higher batting average than another player each year for a number of years, but to have a lower batting average across all of those years. This phenomenon can occur when there are large differences in the number of at bats between the years.
The per-year values aren't weighted in the combined total average.
When told to a statistically illiterate person who isn't aware of Simpson's paradox and so on?