Re:MS Paint and Photos inivisibly watermark even locally gen...
by BeetleB on Monday August 24, 2026 @02:42PM
(#49424139)
OK, but given that GIMP is a general purpose tool, what use is the signature if all of them verify it, when I can drastically change the image to whatever I want it to be?
Re:MS Paint and Photos inivisibly watermark even locally gen...
by Retr0id on Monday August 24, 2026 @02:50PM
(#49424239)
The manifests at each step can embed a thumbnail (although this is optional, iiuc!), so looking at the thumbnail history it should be obvious that the edit was significant.
Re:MS Paint and Photos inivisibly watermark even locally gen...
by BeetleB on Monday August 24, 2026 @04:13PM
(#49425270)
Yeah - I totally would not support that!
Re:MS Paint and Photos inivisibly watermark even locally gen...
by account42 on Tuesday August 25, 2026 @05:44AM
(#49431186)
I can't wait for poking memory of applications running on my computer to become a felony.
Re:MS Paint and Photos inivisibly watermark even locally gen...
by inigyou on Tuesday August 25, 2026 @07:13AM
(#49431945)
It already is.
Each piece of software in the chain must use TPM-like technologies (yes, even GIMP) to make sure it's running a "legitimate" build of the software, on "legitimate" hardware, and re-sign the file at each step along the way (using keys provisioned during some flavour of remote attestation flow, or using a RA-authenticated remote-signing oracle).
The final file embeds every preceding manifest, so you can "verify" all the way back to the original.
If this all sounds patently unworkable, that's because it is.