Re:'Black swans' and 'perfect storms' become lame excuses fo...
by anythinggoes on Wednesday December 19, 2012 @06:01AM
(#4942073)
One major reason why I disagree with the article. Social phenomena are impossible to fully compute as human beings do not just apply to comprehensible laws of physics, but there is a whole different dynamic of behavioral and social factors involved that makes statistic modelling a great deal more complex. Unlike the author I also do not think that this problem can just be resolved with technical means, there will always be uncertainty about human behavior and thus Black Swans.
Re:'Black swans' and 'perfect storms' become lame excuses fo...
by mbesto on Wednesday December 19, 2012 @07:25AM
(#4942263)
Ya, this part irked me the most:
"Traditional financial analysis, she said, is based on evaluating existing statistical data about past events. In her view, analysts can better anticipate market failures – like the financial crisis that began in 2008 – by recognizing precursors and warning signs, and factoring them into a systemic probabilistic analysis."
So, let's say you do provide a systemic probabilistic analysis about the impending education crisis the US is about hit? Don't you think a government would be gnawing their hands off to get that type of statistical analysis? Personally, I don't think it systematically exists.
http://www.amazon.com/Thinking-Fast-Slow-Daniel-Kahneman/dp/...