Solo – a .so loader for static Linux binaries

Re:Solo – a .so loader for static Linux binaries by egoisticalgoat on Wednesday August 19, 2026 @02:50AM (#49357829)

> Obviously, this is an offense to me.

But why? You didn't write it. You said so yourself, you wrote the initial text but it was all reworded by claude.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Solo – a .so loader for static Linux binaries by matheusmoreira on Wednesday August 19, 2026 @03:05AM (#49357960)

It's still his project you're insulting.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Solo – a .so loader for static Linux binaries by account42 on Wednesday August 19, 2026 @04:06AM (#49358508)

Is it? In what sense?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Solo – a .so loader for static Linux binaries by matheusmoreira on Wednesday August 19, 2026 @04:11AM (#49358542)

In the sense that he had the idea and iterated on it until it became something real that actually works.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Solo – a .so loader for static Linux binaries by funlang on Wednesday August 19, 2026 @04:33AM (#49358715)

Agree. The work itself looks solid. Good job to the author.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Solo – a .so loader for static Linux binaries by pg83 on Wednesday August 19, 2026 @04:41AM (#49358763)

Thanks a lot, guys!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Solo – a .so loader for static Linux binaries by funlang on Wednesday August 19, 2026 @04:30AM (#49358693)

I agree. Even if the README was polished with AI, the technical work behind it is impressive. Let's focus on the code.

[ Parent | on HN ]