Re:Scientists stunned by children's lung recovery in ultra l...
by denismenace on Wednesday August 19, 2026 @02:38AM
(#49357724)
The lifetime risk is approximately 1.3% for women and 1.8% for men. For regular smokers: 11.2% for women and 14.8% for men. So about 15 to 30 more likely to get lung cancer. Bringing that down to 4x is close to "almost the same".
Re:Scientists stunned by children's lung recovery in ultra l...
by throw310822 on Wednesday August 19, 2026 @05:35AM
(#49359152)
Might be that I am not reading probabilities correctly, but how do 1.3% -> 11.2% and 1.8% -> 15% become "15 to 30 times more likely"? Sounds like less then ten times?
Re:Scientists stunned by children's lung recovery in ultra l...
by denismenace on Wednesday August 19, 2026 @12:47PM
(#49363963)
Good catch, wrote this on the go. The first stat is a study on Canadians, the second is from another source which is global.
Re:Scientists stunned by children's lung recovery in ultra l...
by anon48293 on Wednesday August 19, 2026 @10:08AM
(#49361852)
No. But that only looks at heavy smokers and duration they stopped, so overselects for old age with higher cancer incidence.
This study looks more broadly, notably also at onset of smoking:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/27...
And this is the TL;DR:
“ Thus, those who quit smoking at ages 15 to 34, 35 to 44, 45 to 54, and 55 to 64 years avoided an estimated 100%, 89%, 78%, and 56% of the excess cancer mortality risk associated with continued smoking, respectively”
https://www.verywellhealth.com/risk-of-lung-cancer-in-former...