Re:OpenLogi
by breznev on Tuesday August 18, 2026 @11:34PM
(#49356385)
Oh it’s not just the site—the app is obviously LLM generated too and feels like it. I gave up and went back to Mos within 20 minutes.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:OpenLogi
by transitorykris on Tuesday August 18, 2026 @11:57PM
(#49356551)
At this point we should be sharing prompts not code for solutions like OpenLogi. Reverse engineering many things can typically be one-shotted (ignoring things like.. capturing a pcap or whatever to aid the effort). Let others add their own taste to the solution.
Isn't it wasteful to have everyone go off and remake the same software with slightly different bugs in it instead of one that fixes almost all of the bugs
Terribly wasteful, yes, though perhaps if the idea caught on the major labs could stand some chance of long-term profitability.
Seriously, I wonder how many tokens are generated (wasted) every day on someone recreating another agent memory, context management, code graph, etc.
I can’t wait until Qwen 4.5 27B or Gemma 5.
Re:OpenLogi
by al_borland on Wednesday August 19, 2026 @02:13AM
(#49357534)
It then becomes a roll of the dice if someone ends up with working software.
Please no, I couldn’t care about your prompts, there is nothing special about them. Anyone can look at the generated artifact and reverse engineer their own prompt in no time