News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Preview of DuckDB v2.0 by jtbaker on Monday August 17, 2026 @12:12PM (#49333360)
I've got a couple of different use cases:

- ETL pipelines running on K8s nodes. Using their streaming processing engine means I can run smaller pods/nodes if needed, for datasets that may have required large dataframe-like transformations that may have buffered a big dataset into memory previously.

- A CLI distributed to an internal team to do a postprocessing step on a large modeling dataset - to get it into a consumable format and upload it to a bucket as a .db file.

- A SvelteKit app that used the node duckdb bindings to attach to the .db on the bucket and explore the results through a suite of BI tools. These tables have millions of rows, and would be pretty heavy to store in PG. The DuckDB version works really, really well.

-

Re:A Preview of DuckDB v2.0 by tccole on Monday August 17, 2026 @01:35PM (#49334691)
Hell yeah; a fellow sveltekit fan.
Re:A Preview of DuckDB v2.0 by staticautomatic on Monday August 17, 2026 @03:34PM (#49336431)
Similar here. Lots of places where we replaced Pandas with DuckDB for transformations. Also have scriptable custom dashboards running on top of BigQuery data pre-aggregated and extracted to parquet on GCS. It's way faster and the only limiting factor is your viz library. It was pretty easy to build and the only big gotcha I encountered was finding, somewhat counter-intuitively, that it's often best minimize partitioning.
Re:A Preview of DuckDB v2.0 by jtbaker on Monday August 17, 2026 @05:16PM (#49337755)
> the only big gotcha I encountered was finding, somewhat counter-intuitively, that it's often best minimize partitioning.

For parquet, I think with partitioning, it's really important to be mindful of the ordering of the data within the parquet file and also the query patterns of the main use cases. A little hard to generalize well to every pattern I guess.