News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Auto-research with codex: How I achieved a 232x Faster Ke... by datakan on Saturday August 15, 2026 @09:26AM (#49310365)
I don't know. That just sounds like throwing money at a problem until it goes away. I'm not convinced that is the correct path forward.
Re:Auto-research with codex: How I achieved a 232x Faster Ke... by dejavucoder on Saturday August 15, 2026 @10:56AM (#49311118)
1. labs have lots of inference capacity 2. they will have domain experts working on this so their efficiency is gonna be exponentially more (can direct LLM better, save money, reach same results faster)
Re:Auto-research with codex: How I achieved a 232x Faster Ke... by fooblaster on Saturday August 15, 2026 @01:18PM (#49312388)
You can't exceed roofline performance on hardware. There is an performance cap you can hit. This recursive self improvement stuff lets you be closer to the pareto frontier, but the idea that it is leading to some exponential growth is a total pipe dream.
Re:Auto-research with codex: How I achieved a 232x Faster Ke... by dejavucoder on Saturday August 15, 2026 @01:34PM (#49312501)
fair enough
Re:Auto-research with codex: How I achieved a 232x Faster Ke... by qeternity on Saturday August 15, 2026 @10:19AM (#49310813)
You say this like that isn’t how the vast majority of problems are solved…