Re:OpenChamber: An Agentic Development Environment
by azuanrb on Sunday August 09, 2026 @04:34PM
(#49235561)
It’s just a personal preference, to be honest, so I wouldn’t overengineer it yet. In my case, I run it in a VM behind Tailscale. The main reason is that I want it to be able to install or use whatever tools it needs without contaminating my main machine. It can expose anything I need over Tailscale. So for me, it’s basically just a cheap, throwaway machine.
Re:OpenChamber: An Agentic Development Environment
by barishnamazov on Sunday August 09, 2026 @06:17PM
(#49236726)
I have a VM in which I run my general compute. In that VM I use incus linux container and run these tools as unauthorized user of the container. That should be reasonable security while having nice control for resources.
Re:OpenChamber: An Agentic Development Environment
by sbysb on Monday August 10, 2026 @12:15AM
(#49239149)
I had another comment in a thread last week about this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49111625
I really think that using something like Paseo (I use Ouijit[1] because I think it's actually a step ahead of where most of these multiplexers are) and nono[2] is basically the best coverage you can have, and really lets you go crazy with auto mode or permission skipping withiout having to worry about any security concerns.
A lot of people lean into the VMs but realistically it's not actually doing a lot of the security work that you need and leaves you wide open to prompt injection/exfiltration attaacks. The flexibility of a good nono setup (which is easy because they ship a nono skill that claude can consume) actually locks things down significantly better
are people using these things but isolating agents to some sort of containerization individually or do you have like one big dev env ? probably time i get around to sorting a better dev container strategy just to isolate agents here but trying to think of the best way to set this up locally.