News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by gstar on Monday February 23, 2009 @11:45AM (#491773)
I'm chuffed that a respectable outfit like last.fm publishes a blog post with a title like that. About time.

Techcrunch has been on the inflection point of "mattering" to the wider public, which scares the life out of me!

Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by j2d2 on Monday February 23, 2009 @12:26PM (#491851)
It's not even grammatically correct!

"Techcrunch is full of shit" would be right.

Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by scott_s on Monday February 23, 2009 @01:33PM (#491957)
Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by CalmQuiet on Monday February 23, 2009 @03:26PM (#492163)
And if you get any news from bbc.co.uk or read British bloggers you'll get accustomed to sports teams and corporations being considered plural. e.g.: "Apple today are releasing..."
Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by electromagnetic on Monday February 23, 2009 @06:35PM (#492402)
Well it's accurate, a corporation isn't an individual and when you're dealing with big business it is always controlled by multiple people so any decision is decided by a group.
Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by rationalbeaver on Tuesday February 24, 2009 @11:19AM (#493206)
Actually a corporation is, legally, an individual.
Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by lutorm on Tuesday February 24, 2009 @04:48PM (#493652)
Unless I'm mistaken, that absurd notion is only entertained in the US.
Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by Angostura on Thursday February 26, 2009 @03:37PM (#496371)
Nope. I am British and used to be a journalist. The first place I worked had a very large sign on the wall:

"Companies are singular".

Which indeed they are, although staffed by multiple individuals.

Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by jd on Wednesday February 25, 2009 @11:04AM (#494494)
It also works like that in the Netherlands.
Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by chiffonade on Monday February 23, 2009 @03:03PM (#492119)
Which is strange, because the whole concept behind the British invention of the "corporation" is to address a group of people as a singular entity.
Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by aristus on Monday February 23, 2009 @03:28PM (#492165)
Not quite -- the underlying concept is a "company" in the sense of a troupe, band, eg "The King's Men", the "Dorrit's Chalk-Weavers", "Harold & Sons".

The idea of a "corporate person" is much more recent, like 1880's, and I think started in the US.

Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by chiffonade on Monday February 23, 2009 @04:04PM (#492219)
No, you're wrong. The concept of corporate singularity started in the 1600s in England.

From wikipedia:

In the late seventeenth century, Stewart Kyd, the author of the first treatise on corporate law in English, defined a corporation as,

"a collection of many individuals united into one body, under a special denomination, having perpetual succession under an artificial form, and vested, by policy of the law, with the capacity of acting, in several respects, as an individual, particularly of taking and granting property..."

Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by jacquesm on Monday February 23, 2009 @06:05PM (#492378)
actually, it started in Holland with the V.O.C.
[deleted]
Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by chiffonade on Tuesday February 24, 2009 @11:54AM (#493261)
I said that it started in the 1600s in England, not that they invented it.

And don't be facetious, everyone knows the Dutch were very innovative during the slave trade.

Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by dustineichler on Tuesday February 24, 2009 @01:06PM (#493352)
Noticed this too, but I think grammatically he used "are" in the inclusive sense that everyone at techcrunch _is_ full of sh*t. therefore, if you work their... it must be so.
Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by 3pt14159 on Monday February 23, 2009 @01:26PM (#491945)
I can't see why you got down voted. That was my first thought when I read it. I reread it 5 or 6 times until I decided that I must be missing something.

TechCrunch = a corporation A corporation = a legal person Singular, not plural!

Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by endtime on Monday February 23, 2009 @01:30PM (#491952)
I can't see why you got down voted.

Probably because his comment isn't interesting, isn't relevant, and doesn't contribute to discussion. There are all kinds of true but uninteresting comments one can make, but making them shouldn't be encouraged.

Edit: I'm sorry if that sounds harsh, but actively discouraging uninteresting comments is what keeps the signal:noise ratio high here.

Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by davidw on Monday February 23, 2009 @02:52PM (#492093)
Exactly. However, once upon a time, this site also had a tradition of not downvoting people all that much for comments that were simply a bit inane or misguided, rather than actively trolling or flaming.
Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by ramchip on Monday February 23, 2009 @05:03PM (#492317)
I'd like to concur on that. I was a bit surprised when I got -4'd for stating that a website ad caused trouble on Opera (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=491583). Perhaps I sounded harsh as well, but still, the goal was just to help...
Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by j2d2 on Tuesday February 24, 2009 @12:23AM (#492692)
Just look at how much chatter it created for something not relevant. Perhaps it's off-topic, but it was interesting to hear HN's views on what is and isn't correct.
Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by jackzombie on Tuesday February 24, 2009 @01:06AM (#492723)
Very true. Proper grammar is important, and this forum is as good as any place to clear up any questions so that mistakes can be avoided in the future.
Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by dunk010 on Monday February 23, 2009 @05:58PM (#492369)
Perhaps, you know, it might have been intentional......
Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by omouse on Monday February 23, 2009 @12:48PM (#491892)
>Techcrunch has been on the inflection point of "mattering" to the wider public, which scares the life out of me!

Your pants must be very soiled. Did you know that the wider public reads tabloids as well? Did you know that they read gossip rags? CLEAN UP IN AISLE GSTAR!

Re:Last.fm: "Techcrunch are full of shit" by gstar on Monday February 23, 2009 @12:53PM (#491897)
Hey, I said life - nobody said anything about brown trousers.

Thanks for your concern though, and I'll just clean up with this copy of the Mirror.