Re:“We have information that Moonshot distilled Fable for th...
by robotpepi on Wednesday July 22, 2026 @02:24PM
(#49011202)
Chatgpt routinely cites and uses papers I don't have access to because they're behind a paywall. I don't think OpenAI is paying for all that copyright. That's in my opinion way more serious.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:“We have information that Moonshot distilled Fable for th...
by fc417fc802 on Wednesday July 22, 2026 @02:46PM
(#49011537)
Yes the fact that the scientific literature - created largely on the back of the tax payer - isn't open to all free of charge by force of law is a travesty. A cartel should not get to charge for access to the bulk of human knowledge. That is indeed a far more important issue than whether or not Moonshot violated the Anthropic ToS, possibly committing mass fraud in the course of doing so.
I mean honestly if they did that why should I care? I'm happy to see copyright violated in a manner that leads to the creation of new technology. IP law exists strictly for the benefit of society and by all appearances AI is an incredibly powerful tool.
Also while I'm at it libgen is a gift to humanity. Information wants to be free. Spreading and preserving knowledge is generally one of the most wholesome activities anyone can undertake as far as I'm concerned.
Re:“We have information that Moonshot distilled Fable for th...
by linkregister on Wednesday July 22, 2026 @03:26PM
(#49012121)
Your statement is orthogonal to my comment. Why reiterate the schadenfreude / fairness comment already stated several dozen times in this thread?
Re:“We have information that Moonshot distilled Fable for th...
by nylonstrung on Wednesday July 22, 2026 @03:15PM
(#49011998)
Who do you think is paying $100K+ for "Enterprise" access to Anna's Archive?