Re:$100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
by 59percentmore on Friday July 17, 2026 @05:51PM
(#48952623)
So, would you agree that working creatively around the Disney-fied locking-down of those tools in order to produce something "provocative, uncomfortable, taboo, explicit, subversive, or challenging of norms" would at least begin to approach being a process that involved at least a semblance of artistic merit?
Because I can assure you that much of what I've gen'd checks those boxes (unless Sorry To Bother You's third-act twist no longer unsettles).
Re:$100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
by 59percentmore on Sunday July 19, 2026 @09:34AM
(#48968104)
Note that he simply downvoted me. I refuse to believe that it's because equisapiens no longer shock.
Re:$100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
by hmry on Monday July 27, 2026 @05:07AM
(#49066932)
FYI it's not possible to downvote replies to your own comment
Re:$100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
by 59percentmore on Monday July 27, 2026 @11:20AM
(#49070941)
"He" being "ryandrake".
Art is (often) provocative, uncomfortable, taboo, explicit, subversive, or challenging of norms. You're never going to get that out of increasingly locked-down and Disney-fied BigTech hosted LLMs obsessed with "AI safety."