Re:$100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
by ryandrake on Friday July 17, 2026 @12:07PM
(#48948988)
> If you've ever tried to get around Gemini or ChatGPT's guardrails, stock footage poisoning
Art is (often) provocative, uncomfortable, taboo, explicit, subversive, or challenging of norms. You're never going to get that out of increasingly locked-down and Disney-fied BigTech hosted LLMs obsessed with "AI safety."
Re:$100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
by 59percentmore on Friday July 17, 2026 @05:51PM
(#48952623)
So, would you agree that working creatively around the Disney-fied locking-down of those tools in order to produce something "provocative, uncomfortable, taboo, explicit, subversive, or challenging of norms" would at least begin to approach being a process that involved at least a semblance of artistic merit?
Because I can assure you that much of what I've gen'd checks those boxes (unless Sorry To Bother You's third-act twist no longer unsettles).
Re:$100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
by 59percentmore on Sunday July 19, 2026 @09:34AM
(#48968104)
Note that he simply downvoted me. I refuse to believe that it's because equisapiens no longer shock.
Re:$100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
by hmry on Monday July 27, 2026 @05:07AM
(#49066932)
FYI it's not possible to downvote replies to your own comment
Re:$100 AI Music Video: Claude Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol
by 59percentmore on Monday July 27, 2026 @11:20AM
(#49070941)
"He" being "ryandrake".
I would love to get around the "individual skill" part, but all of my artist friends would excommunicate me if they knew the AI projects I've been working on, let alone if I asked them to collaborate.