News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Starlink from 1984 by aa-jv on Friday July 17, 2026 @05:32AM (#48945165)
True, they probably didn't read the article - but their claim is still relevant.

We really don't have an easy way in the modern era to share our PC's in such a way that multiple users have their own keyboard/mouse/video combination, even though our PC's are more than capable of doing this - and the underlying technology is all right there in the kernel - but distro's just don't seem to be catering to this need, since the market hasn't identified it as something that users want.

But I guess, if there were a distribution which sets things up so that 4 or more people can use the same PC, it'd get wider adoption. I see no reason why this isn't practical, especially in cubicle environments - one fat PC for 4 or 5 people, who are mostly just doing web browsing, document editing, and ssh'ing to things, seems like a very interesting and viable service to deliver, distro-wise.

I wonder which distro's are closer to achieving this target, in the grand scheme of things .. seems to me its only a matter of configuring the X server properly, with multiple independent display units, and getting the USB keyboard/mouse dance started ..

Re:Starlink from 1984 by inigyou on Friday July 17, 2026 @07:41AM (#48946104)
We really abandoned the idea when computers got so cheap that you could just have a separate computer at each station. Mini PCs are $200, how will your solution compete with that? Thin clients won't get much cheaper than that as they have all the same hardware. Thin-client-less multi-user systems might, but the extra administration complexity ($howmany per sysadmin hour?) will make it a tight squeeze and you may as well just stick with what's familiar.

You could have more luck with AIO PCs.

Re:Starlink from 1984 by aa-jv on Friday July 17, 2026 @08:27AM (#48946550)
Everything you say is true, NUC's kind of ate this problem.

Still, one of these days I'll get around to setting up a system like this, just for the fun of it.

I can think of a few applications where it would be fun. Music-making, for example ..

Re:Starlink from 1984 by inigyou on Friday July 17, 2026 @09:03AM (#48946914)
Linus Tech Tips did one for gaming, just for fun. https://youtube.com/watch?v=uKJw8IKVYQ8
Re:Starlink from 1984 by vel0city on Friday July 17, 2026 @09:03AM (#48946912)
I like this guy's series on building out a collection of SunRay thin clients connecting back to his SPARC server.

https://youtu.be/9BW-mbC7Xag

Re:Starlink from 1984 by gwbas1c on Friday July 17, 2026 @09:38AM (#48947271)
> We really don't have an easy way in the modern era to share our PC's in such a way that multiple users have their own keyboard/mouse/video combination...

> But I guess, if there were a distribution which sets things up so that 4 or more people can use the same PC, it'd get wider adoption...

That makes no sense, for a few reasons:

The shared computer model is generally replaced by RDP (or similar) to a VM running in the cloud.

Vast majority of people use laptops or other portable computers; using networked applications where resource sharing happens "in the cloud": IE, web applications. The portability of laptops trumps stationary computers.

Furthermore, with modern economics, the computing power to do basic computing is so cheap that "dumb terminals" don't make sense anymore: A computer powerful enough to run a web browser costs about the same as what it would take to make a "dumb terminal".

Remember, a typical smart TV is a computer powerful enough to run a web browser or a general office suite.

Re:Starlink from 1984 by wat10000 on Friday July 17, 2026 @10:32AM (#48947840)
Thin clients are incredibly popular these days. It's just that the PC or smartphone is the thin client, and the central "PC" is the cloud.
Re:Starlink from 1984 by BobbyTables2 on Friday July 17, 2026 @11:56PM (#48955073)
Actually trivial now.

Just add a video card and USB card for each head/terminal and pass them into a VM!

(It’s a shame combo video+USB cards don’t exist - would save on slots)