Show HN: I RL-trained an agent that trains models with RL (for –$1.3k)

Re:Show HN: I RL-trained an agent that trains models with RL... by babelfish on Tuesday July 14, 2026 @10:00AM (#48907023)

Did you read the README?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: I RL-trained an agent that trains models with RL... by saberience on Tuesday July 14, 2026 @10:03AM (#48907073)

The AI generated README?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: I RL-trained an agent that trains models with RL... by irickt on Tuesday July 14, 2026 @01:55PM (#48910627)

Your comments are casting aspersion without showing that you have looked into the work or its author. This project is a case study in good work done with heavy ai assistance while it is clear that there is a skilled person leading. I predict that this will become very common and welcome here.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: I RL-trained an agent that trains models with RL... by saberience on Wednesday July 15, 2026 @10:38AM (#48921548)

Why should anyone put serious time and effort into using/understanding a product when the author hasn't put serious time and effort into making it?

I could make this exact same thing over a weekend and post it on Hackernews. But I won't because I would be embarrassed to do so.

The bar for posting something to HN should be high, the bar for wanting people to read your code, your writing, should be putting serious effort and thought into it. Not just vibe coding something up with a vibe coded README and 100% vibe coded code and not even a novel idea or implementation.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Show HN: I RL-trained an agent that trains models with RL... by babelfish on Thursday July 16, 2026 @01:09PM (#48937249)

I think you are putting more effort into arguing it’s not worth it to read the link, than just reading the link would take. I am not sure what you think your comments are accomplishing, they are not useful, just pedantic

[ Parent | on HN ]