News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GAO: DOE Is Prematurely Excluding Less Expensive Options ... by Veelox on Wednesday July 08, 2026 @09:34AM (#48831767)
> $6.6 billion will end world hunger

My understanding is that the only places that are starving is places like Gaza and South Sudan which are poor and actively under attack. Do you have a source for how we can spend <$10b and solve world hunger?

Re:GAO: DOE Is Prematurely Excluding Less Expensive Options ... by shermantanktop on Wednesday July 08, 2026 @10:51AM (#48832760)
I read the comment as a set of examples to make a point. Sounds like you read it as a laundry list of facts that should each have cited sources.

Both could be true, but OPs point is clear and valid even without sourcing a (perhaps hyperbolic) statement.

Re:GAO: DOE Is Prematurely Excluding Less Expensive Options ... by TheGRS on Wednesday July 08, 2026 @11:39AM (#48833402)
They're referencing a pretty publicized spat between some folks at the UN and Elon Musk promising he would donate that amount of money towards solving world hunger. It was meant as an example of pricing at this scale. https://factually.co/fact-checks/business/elon-musk-6-billio...
Re:GAO: DOE Is Prematurely Excluding Less Expensive Options ... by throwaway27448 on Wednesday July 08, 2026 @12:47PM (#48834226)
Where did you get that understanding?? People are starving all over the world, even in places that generally have access to food markets. Food insecurity exists outside of famine, sanctions, etc.