A verification loop 4x'd DeepSeek's intelligence, matching Opus at 1/7 the cost

Re:A verification loop 4x'd DeepSeek's intelligence, matchin... by sozal on Wednesday July 08, 2026 @01:25AM (#48827865)

It's not too long for humans, but it seems that it's too long for you maybe because you don't know how to read :) You didn't finish it, so you assumed nobody could. Don't speak for all humans based on your own reading.

Haters like you, who skim other people's comments and pass them off as their own thoughts, are everywhere. I don't have time for it. Try you chance with other posts.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A verification loop 4x'd DeepSeek's intelligence, matchin... by subscribed on Wednesday July 08, 2026 @04:14AM (#48829070)

I read people's work, I stop reading AI slop that people say it's their work.

I didn't say I skimmed your comments, no need to lie if you don't have a good response.

You're too enraged people expect some baseline quality from whatever you post. Why is that so much?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A verification loop 4x'd DeepSeek's intelligence, matchin... by sozal on Wednesday July 08, 2026 @05:11AM (#48829515)

It is not the AI slop, it is the benchmark prepared and done by humans which people like you can't understand. You still keep posting slop comments without ZERO concrete argument.

And also, I'm not saying you said you skimmed my comments. It doesn't need to be said, it is obvious that you wrote those comments without opening the link by just reading other's comments. That's it!

[ Parent | on HN ]