Re:Every new car sold in the European Union must include a d...
by Scoundreller on Tuesday July 07, 2026 @07:09PM
(#48825247)
Dunno why these programs never took a sampling approach and data-mined which makes/models/years to target the next year/cycle.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Every new car sold in the European Union must include a d...
by projektfu on Tuesday July 07, 2026 @07:24PM
(#48825391)
The only way to have affordable, ubiquitous testing stations is to make it universal. At least, in states that do not also require safety inspections. If only 10,000 cars were tested each year, nobody would buy the equipment.
Re:Every new car sold in the European Union must include a d...
by Scoundreller on Tuesday July 07, 2026 @08:08PM
(#48825744)
Mass (unnecessary) testing is only more affordable if you value people’s time at $0
Re:Every new car sold in the European Union must include a d...
by projektfu on Tuesday July 07, 2026 @08:47PM
(#48826035)
It's not going to keep old cars on the road if you mandate expensive tests to do so, when new cars don't need the tests.
Re:Every new car sold in the European Union must include a d...
by consensus1 on Wednesday July 08, 2026 @03:38AM
(#48828792)
Which is precisely what government bureaucrats value your time in complying with their arbitrary bullshit at.
Re:Every new car sold in the European Union must include a d...
by Dylan16807 on Tuesday July 07, 2026 @09:23PM
(#48826298)
I don't see what the issue is. Pay the people running the test station more per test but less overall.
Extremely rough example numbers: Instead of testing a million cars for $20 each, 10k cars are tested for $200 each. 85% of testing stations shut down, and the rest downsize if they can, but there's still plenty of them around. The total cost of testing drops 90%. The state taxes every car $2 to pay for the randomized testing; being selected means you lose an hour driving to the station, not that you lose $200 of your own money.