News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Python 3.14 compiled to metal – no interpreter. Parent comment

Re:Python 3.14 compiled to metal – no interpreter by kameit00 on Monday July 06, 2026 @04:31PM (#48810113)
In 12 months… vibe code mess. Or discontinued. Or both.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Python 3.14 compiled to metal – no interpreter by ttul on Monday July 06, 2026 @06:03PM (#48811098)
How much time have you spent with Fable? We're in new territory here. It does not create messes.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Python 3.14 compiled to metal – no interpreter by nozzlegear on Monday July 06, 2026 @06:54PM (#48811545)
> We're in new territory here.

> It does not create messes.

?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Python 3.14 compiled to metal – no interpreter by ubercore on Monday July 06, 2026 @06:20PM (#48811253)
Anecdote, yes, but I am _right now in the middle of helping Fable clean up a mess_. Complex code is hard and Fable still makes mistakes.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Python 3.14 compiled to metal – no interpreter by what on Monday July 06, 2026 @06:35PM (#48811396)
>this time it’s different!

Same thing people claim every time a new model is released, yet never seems to be true.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Python 3.14 compiled to metal – no interpreter by int_19h on Tuesday July 07, 2026 @02:07AM (#48814176)
It was true every time though. The capacity of frontier models to tackle complicated issues has improved immensely. I still remember the first time I saw a model do a non-trivial issue end to end, and that was less than two years ago. Now they can genuinely do whole projects with human only as a supervisor / quality checker.

Do they still make mistakes? Sure. So do humans, though, so it would be unrealistic to expect perfection. The question is: does Fable make fewer mistakes than the median human coder? And at this point I'm genuinely not sure anymore.

[ Parent | on HN ]