News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:OpenPrinter by VorpalWay on Sunday July 05, 2026 @05:47PM (#48798262)
Hm, I guess there is no law. But why would so many manufacturers include this unless there is some legal reason or other pressure on them to do so?
Re:OpenPrinter by t-3 on Sunday July 05, 2026 @06:39PM (#48798633)
National security letters or old boys network or maybe just fat bribes to the right engineer. Could be a requirement for government procurement too, so not a law, just the requirement of a huge customer with deep pockets and negative price sensitivity.
Re:OpenPrinter by attila-lendvai on Sunday July 05, 2026 @05:52PM (#48798297)
if i gave a plausible hypothesis to this, then i would be downwoted and ridiculed here on HN...
Re:OpenPrinter by cwillu on Sunday July 05, 2026 @06:09PM (#48798395)
Thanks for letting us know, I guess?
Re:OpenPrinter by flexagoon on Sunday July 05, 2026 @07:49PM (#48799163)
Unlike now, where instead of saying your hypothesis you're just letting every reader come up with what they think is a crazy conspiracy theory and ascribe it to you?
Re:OpenPrinter by attila-lendvai on Thursday July 09, 2026 @11:32AM (#48847610)
at least this way i spent my reputation to show a mirror, instead of shouting pointlessly into the abyss...
Re:OpenPrinter by Dibby053 on Monday July 06, 2026 @12:15AM (#48800570)
>or other pressure on them

Counterfeiting was a big worry as high-resolution color printers became cheap. They did it motu proprio just like today ~all AI gen services watermark their outputs.