>One nights-and-weekends developer.

What?

This is being made by one person as a side project (not done during core working hours)

Why is that a bullet point under "What's not done"? It's confusing in that context, almost as if an AI wrote it and then it wasn't looked over.

You could nitpick the subsection title, and from that perspective "What's not done" is a bit of a catch-all for caveats.

With that said, I think it's pretty easy to infer the meaning there.

I'm not really sure how else to be more transparent about things, but I am using an AI-augmented engineering as the core workflow for the project, and that includes drafting docs and this post.

I read and edit the work. For a side-project with no current community support or users, I need to make a judicious decision when to spend time and effort. IMO it is reasonable _not_ to try to trick anyone into thinking that AI is not used. My proof reading and editing will miss things from time-to-time. I'm OK with it at the current scale of the project.

Next time curate what Claude/Codex tells you, this text seems targeted towards you, not a potential user

100%

What gives you that impression?