Go at Google: Language Design in the Service of Software Engineering

Re:Go at Google: Language Design in the Service of Software ... by agentS on Tuesday December 04, 2012 @08:45PM (#4874440)

Considering one of the goals of the language is simplicity, I don't see how D has solved this problem.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go at Google: Language Design in the Service of Software ... by pjmlp on Wednesday December 05, 2012 @03:05AM (#4875400)

Because everyone else doesn't want to throw away the last 20 years of language design.

Go's search for simplicity is seen as a solution looking for a problem in the language design communities.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go at Google: Language Design in the Service of Software ... by danieldk on Wednesday December 05, 2012 @03:27AM (#4875440)

Go's search for simplicity is seen as a solution looking for a problem in the language design communities.

But most programmers are not in language design communities. There is a big potential for a 'safer C' or a 'faster Python'. Yes, that's a simplification, but also how people will see Go.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go at Google: Language Design in the Service of Software ... by pjmlp on Wednesday December 05, 2012 @04:14AM (#4875543)

> 'faster Python'

Why throw away Python's capabilities to execute it faster? Just make use of PyPy.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go at Google: Language Design in the Service of Software ... by Symmetry on Wednesday December 05, 2012 @09:31AM (#4876362)

PyPy is geometrically about halfway between CPython and Go, performance-wise.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go at Google: Language Design in the Service of Software ... by pjmlp on Wednesday December 05, 2012 @10:07AM (#4876527)

For the type of applications Google is showing off with Go, I doubt it matters.

[ Parent | on HN ]