News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on US Supreme Court rules geofence warrants require constitutional protections. Parent comment

Re:US Supreme Court rules geofence warrants require constitu... by sidewndr46 on Monday June 29, 2026 @04:59PM (#48725155)
The case was a shooting. It seemed remarkable they had neither a gun, spent cartridge cases, blood, flesh, wounds, or anything in the way of physical evidence.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:US Supreme Court rules geofence warrants require constitu... by s1artibartfast on Monday June 29, 2026 @09:44PM (#48727632)
The question remains what they did have.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:US Supreme Court rules geofence warrants require constitu... by 8note on Monday June 29, 2026 @10:00PM (#48727712)
presumably the local noble didnt like them, and the jury knew to follow along.

the south is also known for putting people in prison without even having a charge. just a guilty result

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:US Supreme Court rules geofence warrants require constitu... by sidewndr46 on Monday June 29, 2026 @10:22PM (#48727863)
In terms of physical evidence? None.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:US Supreme Court rules geofence warrants require constitu... by s1artibartfast on Monday June 29, 2026 @11:17PM (#48728120)
Evidence, not physical evidence. The instructions seem entirely reasonable.

There is no hard rule for physical evidence. If other evidence is enough to convince 12 jurors beyond a reasonable doubt, it could be very significant.

[ Parent | on HN ]