Re:Professor denounces mass AI fraud on an exam at Brown Uni...
by rtpg on Sunday June 28, 2026 @10:31PM
(#48714136)
2 is “fine”, or that’s just the status quo. The friction from copying over stuff from a tiny phone screen discretely is the cost to cheat as well
I don’t know about 1s practicality. In my schooling it would always be doable but I have the impression US schools are a different scale
Re:Professor denounces mass AI fraud on an exam at Brown Uni...
by cholmdomsky on Sunday June 28, 2026 @11:13PM
(#48714377)
Jfc, this is a solved problem at the community college near me. All of the computers in the testing room are thin clients that effectively remote into a vm, and you get checked with a metal detector before going into the room with the computers.
If you can escape the vm on the fly and manage to use an llm to cheat, you deserve that A.
Re:Professor denounces mass AI fraud on an exam at Brown Uni...
by SkiFire13 on Monday June 29, 2026 @02:05AM
(#48715419)
I graduated from a not so incredible university and we had multiple such rooms. Teaching assistants and some tutors helped supervising the exams and it wasn't easy to cheat without getting caught.
Re:Professor denounces mass AI fraud on an exam at Brown Uni...
by yuye on Monday June 29, 2026 @06:22AM
(#48717298)
>How practical is this?
This is basically how ICPC works (https://icpc.global/)
Contestant computers boot a Linux image that contains all the interpreters/compilers and documentation for the supported languages, some editors/IDEs(vim, Jetbrains, Eclipse, etc) and a web browser.
Network access is limited to the judging system only.
My experience in Europe is that most universities can support this.
How practical is this?
1. Is your institution able to provide this support?
2. Do you believe you are able to supervise the room well enough that students will be caught if they cheat? (Eg, bring a phone and look up answers.)