News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reducing tick density along recreational trails in Ottawa... by roshin on Saturday June 27, 2026 @04:35PM (#48701515)
I would much rather encounter a hungry tick on a recreational trail than a hungry wolf
Re:Reducing tick density along recreational trails in Ottawa... by rescripting on Saturday June 27, 2026 @04:50PM (#48701635)
A hungry tick is much more likely to make your life miserable because you’re significantly more likely to encounter one in ecosystems with both species.
Re:Reducing tick density along recreational trails in Ottawa... by trollbridge on Saturday June 27, 2026 @05:52PM (#48702122)
Make sure the wolves are well fed.
Re:Reducing tick density along recreational trails in Ottawa... by orbital-decay on Sunday June 28, 2026 @02:00AM (#48704815)
You just have to outrun the other hikers.
Re:Reducing tick density along recreational trails in Ottawa... by jmye on Saturday June 27, 2026 @10:36PM (#48703820)
Given the utter paucity of wolf attacks on humans (vastly, incomprehensibly lower than the rates of Lyme disease), this is a deeply silly thing to worry about.

It’s really clear, sometimes, who hasn’t seen a place that isn’t paved.

Re:Reducing tick density along recreational trails in Ottawa... by Earw0rm on Sunday June 28, 2026 @03:48AM (#48705291)
This feels like a generalisable cognitive bug with our species.

"Kill all the wolves, die as a result from invisible bacteria carried by tiny arthropods - or from Type 2 diabetic heart failure, as getting out for a hike and staying safe is now too much hassle".

Re:Reducing tick density along recreational trails in Ottawa... by skywal_l on Sunday June 28, 2026 @04:11AM (#48705388)
So I don't necessarily disagree with you but people way more rugged than we are and who didn't even knew what a paved road was decided to get rid of wolves a long time ago.

Moreover, what I observed is that urban professional class populations are usually way more in favor of wolves reintroduction than rural working class population.

Re:Reducing tick density along recreational trails in Ottawa... by choo-t on Sunday June 28, 2026 @04:35AM (#48705499)
> Moreover, what I observed is that urban professional class populations are usually way more in favor of wolves reintroduction than rural working class population.

Perhaps their reasons is an economic one (wolf attacks on livestock) and not an human safety one ?

Re:Reducing tick density along recreational trails in Ottawa... by Y-bar on Sunday June 28, 2026 @05:06AM (#48705645)
It is definitely an economic one. I occasionally help on a sheep farm which has not been attacked. But colleagues on farms in neighbouring counties have had sheep killed by local wolves. Even if they publicly claim they they lost a lot of money and work (which is true) they also say also fear for their safety. However, in private they are not worried, they know the wolves will flee as soon as a human appears.
Re:Reducing tick density along recreational trails in Ottawa... by wqaatwt on Sunday June 28, 2026 @10:33AM (#48707654)
Well because they would risk losing a handful of sheep occasionally (which the government would likely pay for anyway). Also the prevalence of general cultural hatred of natural habitats and ecosystems prevalent amongst some sections of rural populations.

> was decided to get rid of wolves a long time ago.

Outside of islands like Britain that only really happened in the 1800s after wolves stopped being a threat anyway. Also interestingly enough in quite a few places in Western Europe more area was deforested and exploited for agriculture between the medieval period and the 20th century than now. That naturally made cohabiting with wolves and bears a bit problematic (now there are way more forests and protected areas, of course this only really applies to Europe not North America)