News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:You are an amazing engineer, but you are a terrible fit f... by btilly on Monday December 03, 2012 @07:19PM (#4868774)
You are correct, and this is one reason why it was difficult for me to see a better frame. Of course once I am aware that a better frame exists, I should give the benefit of the doubt by assuming that one until proven otherwise. (Even if I suspect it is not what was truly going on.)
Re:You are an amazing engineer, but you are a terrible fit f... by klibertp on Monday December 03, 2012 @10:44PM (#4869421)
I can only say I admire your determination here. In this specific case I have no or very little doubt that your suspicion is correct, especially in the light of later edits above. I think that I personally wouldn't be able to reframe the situation and change my way of thinking just because I was shown that it is possible. I suspect I wouldn't even want to, and it's not a noble thing to do, and I know this, but I think I still wouldn't be able to stop. I just wanted to say that I'm really impressed that you were able to overcome these emotions, really, honestly impressed.
Re:You are an amazing engineer, but you are a terrible fit f... by mst on Monday December 03, 2012 @07:49PM (#4868900)
Given the answer to "whoa, seriously?" is "yes" in your case, a good faith answer to a bad faith question is also the most effective smackdown; I find arranging things such to be useful where I have such suspicions :)