Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

Re:Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole i... by Sanzig on Thursday June 25, 2026 @09:40AM (#48673232)

Ideally yes, but we know people don't RTFA - there's a reason that initialism dates back to early Slashdot.

The paraphrase is doing a lot of heavy lifting to convert it to ragebait. Had the OP gone with something like "you didn't vibe code it, you plagiarized Papermark's open source project" (may need some editing to fit under the character limit) it would have at least been more true to the original tweet.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole i... by jknoepfler on Thursday June 25, 2026 @09:51AM (#48673412)

I know I RTFA, and I know I'm not interested in discussing things with people who don't. Maybe others feel differently, because more people is better or something. Information pollution is a serious, persistent, growing problem and I'm just not inclined to be tolerant about it anymore. Mistakes are one thing, deliberate stupidity is another.

If you come to book club without reading the book, and you derail the conversation into something completely irrelevant, you're not getting invited back.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole i... by hluska on Friday June 26, 2026 @09:34AM (#48686484)

That’s a lot of rage for something that does not impact you at all. Who cares? You don’t get to control everything around you online.

[ Parent | on HN ]